The Substitute 4#306 / 2009-04-13
Claiming the Bible to be the literal word of God is silly. Or is it?
It cannot be denied the Bible contains many contradictions. Hell, even the first book, Genesis, contains competing accounts of Creation.
But I wonder, mightn't those taking up the literal view merely be well-read in advanced multidimensional physics? Mightn't an omnipresent God confuse chronology when infinitely many chronologies exist, spread across infinitely many p-branes?
Yeah, I guess not. It is silly.
#303 / The Substitute 1
#304 / The Substitute 2
#305 / The Substitute 3
#306 / The Substitute 4
#307 / The Substitute 5
#308 / The Substitute 6